JUNE 2008 HOT TOPICS

Evaluating NYPD’s Firearms Training and Discharge Cases

New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers are taught that they should use their firearms as a “last resort” to protect themselves or others from imminent death or serious injury. In New York City—as is true nationally—the use of lethal force is rare. Still, when a NYPD officer discharges a firearm, it is a significant event, with the department undertaking an extensive investigation of the incident. To ensure the department was doing everything it could to minimize the unnecessary discharge of firearms, New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly asked the RAND Corporation to examine the issue.

Based on discussions with NYPD leadership and officers, the review of NYPD policy documents, firearm-discharge cases and department data, and the relevant general literature on policing, use of force, and reflexive and contagious shooting, the study team assessed a number of issues, including training, discharge investigations and reporting, factors associated with officers who discharge their firearms, the need for improved less-than-lethal standoff weapons and other innovative technologies, and reflexive shooting.

The study found that there were no real issues with basic policing-skills training but that training in complex policing skills—those that integrate law and policy, effective communication, decisionmaking, and tactics—could be improved. The study team also found that based on a review of national best practices, the NYPD’s firearms discharge review process has a number of exemplary features but that it too could be improved.

Also, by matching shooting officers with those non-shooting officers at or near the scene of a shooting incident, the authors were able to statistically determine certain characteristics associated with a higher risk of being involved in a shooting—characteristics that describe more assertive officers, ones who can both perform heroic actions and garner medals and simultaneously act in ways that warrant negative marks in their files.

The study also examined the need for improved less-than-lethal weapons and other technologies. One of the findings, based on an analysis of the NYPD firearm-discharge cases and the experience of other police departments, is that, if the NYPD had a broader deployment of a more robust less-than-lethal standoff weapon, such as TASER® devices, it not only might prevent some incidents from escalating to deadly force but might also reduce injuries to officers and citizens alike, as has been the case in other departments.

Finally, the study team examined the issue of reflexive discharges—what are referred to as contagious shootings—and found data are not readily available, either within NYPD or across other departments, to determine the extent of reflexive shootings or whether they are increasing or decreasing over time.

For each set of findings, the study offered detailed recommendations for improvement. For example, the authors recommended that the NYPD training devote more time to hands-on practice and that the discharge review include a formal process for drawing lessons from shootings to be disseminated to officers. As another example, the study, building off the findings on the potential utility of TASER devices, recommended that the NYPD implement a pilot program that expands the current availability of TASER devices to all patrol officers in selected precincts.

READ THE RESEARCH BRIEF: Assessing the New York City Police Department Firearm Training and Firearm-Discharge Review Process

Dealing with the Challenge of Police Officer Recruitment and Retention: A National Summit

Pending baby-boom generation retirements, military callups, local budget crises, competition for qualified applicants, and the changing job preferences of today’s youth all exacerbate the challenge police agencies face in recruiting and retaining police officers. This is at the same time when many urban communities are dealing with increasing violence and homeland security demands. Many police agencies report particular difficulty in recruiting minority and female officers.

With support from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services and the National Institute of Justice, the RAND Center on Quality Policing (CQP) hosted a national summit on Police Recruitment and Retention in the Contemporary Urban Environment in its Washington D.C. office on June 17 and 18. The summit provided a forum for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers from across the country to discuss current challenges, research findings and their implications, and other emerging developments and innovations from the field.

The program featured several panels on a number of topics, including causes of staff shortages, proven and promising strategies for recruitment and retention, hiring of minority and female officers, the impact of staffing on other priorities such as community policing and homeland security, and lessons learned from other employment sectors, such as the military.

READ MORE: Police Recruitment and Retention Clearinghouse

The RAND Safety and Justice Program conducts research, analysis, and demonstrations that help policymakers, government agencies, and communities improve public safety. To access our research, please visit our website at www.rand.org/ise/safety/.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world.

Learn More »

Copyright © 2008 RAND Corporation. 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401-3208. RAND® is a registered trademark.

The RAND Safety and Justice Congressional Newsletter is distributed on an opt-in basis only by visiting us at www.rand.org. We respect your privacy. If you do not wish to receive this periodic newsletter, please email ocr@rand.org or call (703) 413-1100 x5395.

This newsletter is also available on the RAND Congressional web site at http://www.rand.org/congress/newsletters/safety_justice/2008/06/.