Document Information
Insights on Aircraft Programmed Depot Maintenance
An Analysis of F-15 PDM
This technical report describes the F-15 programmed depot maintenance (PDM) process as performed at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center (WR-ALC) in FYs 2004-2006. WR-ALC has a sequential process that F-15s follow when undergoing PDM. The average WR-ALC F-15 PDM visit runs behind schedule. This problem was reduced in recent years, largely because planned durations became more realistic. Durations also seem longer because customers do not pick aircraft up as soon as they finish PDM. Pickup lags for F-15s based overseas are expected, because they are typically flown overseas in pairs to make more efficient use of aerial tanker refueling. However, even for continental United States-based aircraft, it was not uncommon for operators to wait a week or more to retrieve their completed F-15s. Finally, the number of days spent at specific steps in the PDM process varies considerably, and, because PDM does not have a particularly high priority, it can wait a long time for parts. This leads to aircraft moving through PDM steps out of sequence, with missing parts catching up with the aircraft when they become available, or to cannibalization, in which aircraft that recently entered PDM provide cannibalized parts for aircraft that are scheduled to leave sooner.
Support RAND Research — Buy This Product!
Paperback Cover Price: $20.00
Discounted Web Price: $18.00
Pages: 38
ISBN/EAN: 9780833042989
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
RAND makes an electronic version of this document available for free as a public service. If you find this information valuable, please consider purchasing a paper copy of the full document to help support RAND research.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Contents
Chapter One:
Introduction
Chapter Two:
The F-15 and Its Programmed Depot Maintenance
Chapter Three:
F-15 Programmed Depot Maintenance Durations
Chapter Four:
F-15 Programmed Depot Maintenance Part Issues
Chapter Five:
Concluding Discussion
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
* RAND research is conducted across divisions, centers, and projects; these organizational components are represented in the "Related RAND Divisions" section above.
Top
RAND® is a registered trademark. Copyright © 1994-2008 RAND Corporation. Last Modified: August 20, 2008 